THE LONDON VIP.td-all-devices { display: block !important; visibility: visible !important; opacity: 1 !important; z-index: 9999 !important; /* Garante que o banner fique no topo */ position: relative !important; /* Evita interferências */ } .td-all-devices img { max-width: 100% !important; height: auto !important; animation: none !important; /* Remove animações que podem causar desaparecimento */ } .td-all-devices { display: block !important; visibility: visible !important; opacity: 1 !important; } .td-all-devices img { animation: none !important; }

A magical clause does not necessarily nullify employment status

0
A recent ruling has provided a timely reminder that substance trumps form in employment status disputes, and the mere insertion of a clause does not automatically change the employment status of workers. This case concerns an appeal by BCAL, a company that provides vehicle collection, inspection,

An employee’s emergency contact details are strictly private

0
A recent ruling affirms that an employer is directly liable for the unauthorised disclosure of an employee's private information. An employee worked at a JD Wetherspoon pub for approximately eighteen months, during which time she provided her contact details, including her mother's mobile number as

Being paid directly is not a confirmation that you are an employee

0
A Tribunal has provided a landmark ruling over employer-employee status in the context of direct payments made under the Care Act 2014, ruling that an LA was not in fact the direct employer of a carer. The appeal revolved around the question of whether the LA was the de facto employer of V, who had

Pivotal role of the union Certification Officer in addressing complaints

0
A recent tribunal clarified the procedural powers of the Certification Officer (CO), ruling that applications from trade union members cannot be refused simply because they are deemed "unarguable". After becoming Chair of a prestigious university, the appellant faced three internal

When changing a company’s name absolves a daughter company of its obligations

0
The Court of Appeal addressed the complexities of benefit scheme amendments and the lines of responsibility within corporate structures in a complex case surrounding

A return to gender rationality in the office? What does the Supreme Court ruling...

0
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court clarified the legal interpretation of the words ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in Sections 11 and 212(1) of the Equality Act (EA) 2010 with

The importance of discretion – don’t send inappropriate messages during working hours!

0
An Employment Tribunal confirmed that using an employer's preferred method of communicating with employees to send offensive messages can serve as a ground for dismissal. A

The innocent touch – where a lack of clear guidelines and policies makes a...

0
A school inspector dismissed for brushing water off a pupil’s head won his unfair dismissal claim against OFSTED. Mr. Hewston worked as a Social Care Regulatory Inspector and, on

Employment Restrictions After Termination: Be Cautious

0
Kau Media Group (KMG) Ltd. sought to enforce two post-termination employment restriction (PTRs) contained in a contract of employment to restrict Mr. Hart, a former employee, from

Beware of rushing to judgement before terminating employment.

0
A Tribunal has ruled that a deputy security manager was unfairly dismissed, despite performing “no prescribed tasks” while ‘working from home’, many hundreds of miles
0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Recent Posts