THE LONDON VIP.td-all-devices { display: block !important; visibility: visible !important; opacity: 1 !important; z-index: 9999 !important; /* Garante que o banner fique no topo */ position: relative !important; /* Evita interferências */ } .td-all-devices img { max-width: 100% !important; height: auto !important; animation: none !important; /* Remove animações que podem causar desaparecimento */ } .td-all-devices { display: block !important; visibility: visible !important; opacity: 1 !important; } .td-all-devices img { animation: none !important; }

Self-employment cannot be used as a tax smokescreen for contracted employees

0
A complex celebrity case arose recently in which the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) was asked to consider the application of the intermediaries’ legislation (IR35), otherwise known

Not all hurt feelings are uncapped & costly

0
The Employment Appeal Tribunal slashed a £10,000 award for injury to feeling by 80% after an original tribunal ruling was deemed not to be Meek compliant as it failed to provide

The importance of discretion – don’t send inappropriate messages during working hours!

0
An Employment Tribunal confirmed that using an employer's preferred method of communicating with employees to send offensive messages can serve as a ground for dismissal. A

A return to gender rationality in the office? What does the Supreme Court ruling...

0
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court clarified the legal interpretation of the words ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in Sections 11 and 212(1) of the Equality Act (EA) 2010 with

When changing a company’s name absolves a daughter company of its obligations

0
The Court of Appeal addressed the complexities of benefit scheme amendments and the lines of responsibility within corporate structures in a complex case surrounding

Pivotal role of the union Certification Officer in addressing complaints

0
A recent tribunal clarified the procedural powers of the Certification Officer (CO), ruling that applications from trade union members cannot be refused simply because they are deemed "unarguable". After becoming Chair of a prestigious university, the appellant faced three internal
0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Recent Posts