THE LONDON VIP.td-all-devices { display: block !important; visibility: visible !important; opacity: 1 !important; z-index: 9999 !important; /* Garante que o banner fique no topo */ position: relative !important; /* Evita interferências */ } .td-all-devices img { max-width: 100% !important; height: auto !important; animation: none !important; /* Remove animações que podem causar desaparecimento */ } .td-all-devices { display: block !important; visibility: visible !important; opacity: 1 !important; } .td-all-devices img { animation: none !important; }

Self-employment cannot be used as a tax smokescreen for contracted employees

0
A complex celebrity case arose recently in which the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) was asked to consider the application of the intermediaries’ legislation (IR35), otherwise known

Pivotal role of the union Certification Officer in addressing complaints

0
A recent tribunal clarified the procedural powers of the Certification Officer (CO), ruling that applications from trade union members cannot be refused simply because they are deemed "unarguable". After becoming Chair of a prestigious university, the appellant faced three internal

Beware of rushing to judgement before terminating employment.

0
A Tribunal has ruled that a deputy security manager was unfairly dismissed, despite performing “no prescribed tasks” while ‘working from home’, many hundreds of miles

The innocent touch – where a lack of clear guidelines and policies makes a...

0
A school inspector dismissed for brushing water off a pupil’s head won his unfair dismissal claim against OFSTED. Mr. Hewston worked as a Social Care Regulatory Inspector and, on

Employment Restrictions After Termination: Be Cautious

0
Kau Media Group (KMG) Ltd. sought to enforce two post-termination employment restriction (PTRs) contained in a contract of employment to restrict Mr. Hart, a former employee, from

A return to gender rationality in the office? What does the Supreme Court ruling...

0
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court clarified the legal interpretation of the words ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in Sections 11 and 212(1) of the Equality Act (EA) 2010 with
0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Recent Posts